Viva Wikipedia
Nuorempana sällinä minua kutsuttiin Vikiksi. Kun törmäsin nuoruuden kaveriin, hän lohkaisi:
– Toi sun Vikipedia on hyvä homma.
On helppoa arvostella Wikipediaa. Mutta useinkaan se ei ole oikeudenmukaista, varsinkin jos puhutaan englanninkielisestä Wikipediasta.
Joskus löytää helmiä niin asiasisällön kuin tyylinkin kannalta. Joskus myös puuduttavan pitkiä juttuja – mikä voi kertoa akateemisuudesta.
Wikipedian taso on vaihteleva, varsinkin suomenkielisen. Löytyy tosi tynkä juttuja turhan paljon. Taso ei aina huimaa. Mutta jutut on käsittääkseni aina tarkastettu Wikipedian avustajien toimesta.
Mutta katso vaikka suomenkielisen Wikipedian Antiikin filosofia artikkelia, niin huomaat asiantuntijoiden olevan monien tekstien takana.
Englanninkielinen Wikipedia on minun otannan mukaan usein asiantuntijoiden kirjoittama. Usein jutut ovat tieteellistä tasoa lähdeluetteloineen.
Samantapaista olen huomannut ranskankielisen ja saksankielisen Wikipedian suhteen varsinkin artikkeleista, joissa kerrotaan noiden kielialueiden asioista.
Ruotsinkielinen Wikipedia on ilmeisesti laajempi kujin suomenkielinen, ehkä tasokkaampikin mm. laajemman kielialueen vuoksi.
Olisi hyvä, että suomenkieliset asiantuntijat kirjoittaisivat enemmän Wikipediaan. Ainakin jossain tapauksissa se voisi olla aika helppoa: referoi omia kirjoituksiaan. Ainakin julkaisemattomia kirjoituksia voisi laittaa sellaisenaan.
Opiskelijoiden ansiokkaita töitä, ryhmätöitä Wikipediaan?
Wikipedian hienous on myös siinä, että artikkeleita voi kritisoida ja niistä voi käydä keskustelua Wikipediassa.
Olisi ihan hyvä, jos moni suomenkilinen Wikipedia korvattaisiin englanninkielisen Wikipedian käännöksellä.
Aika kuvaavana esimerkkinä Wikipedian paremmasta puolesta on Wikipedian artikkelin Origin of the Palestinians lähdeluettelo. Se on 24 sivua pitkä. FB hyväksyy vain 8000 merkkiä eli alla on osa lähdeluetteloa. Ei vaikuta ihan pinnalliselta.
Veikko Tarvainen
veikonvenytys.fi
11.8.2024
References
”The A to Z of the Arab-Israeli conflict”. The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2024-05-01. Palestinians – A population of around 14m people who trace their origins to British-ruled Palestine. Around 7m Palestinians live in Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Another 7m are strewn across the Arab world and beyond. Nearly 6m are registered as refugees.
David Goodblatt (2006). ”The political and social history of the Jewish community in the Land of Israel, c. 235–638”. In Steven Katz (ed.). The Cambridge History of Judaism. Vol. IV. Cambridge University Press. pp. 404–430. ISBN 978-0-521-77248-8.
Levy-Rubin, Milka (2000). ”New Evidence Relating to the Process of Islamization in Palestine in the Early Muslim Period: The Case of Samaria”. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. 43 (3): 257–276. doi:10.1163/156852000511303. ISSN 0022-4995. JSTOR 3632444.
Cohen, Amnon, and Bernard Lewis. Population and Revenue in the Towns of Palestine in the Sixteenth Century. Princeton University Press, 1978. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x196g. Accessed 11 Nov. 2023.
Grossman, D. (1986). ”Oscillations in the Rural Settlement of Samaria and Judaea in the Ottoman Period”. in Shomron studies. Dar, S., Safrai, S., (eds). Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing House. p. 314-317, 345-385
Grossman, David (2017). Distribution and Population Density During the Late Ottoman and Early Mandate Periods (9781315128825 ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 44–52. doi:10.4324/9781315128825. ISBN 9781315128825. They came from Circassia and Chechnya, and were refugees from territories annexed by Russia in 1864, and the Bosnian Muslims, whose province was lost to Serbia in 1878. Belonging to this category were the Algerians (Mughrabis), who arrived in Syria and Palestine in several waves after 1850 in the wake of France’s conquest of their country and the waves of Egyptian migration to Palestine and Syria during the rule of Muhammad Ali and his son, Ibrahim Pasha. […] In most cases the Egyptian army dropouts and the other Egyptian settlers preferred to settle in existing localities, rather than to establish new villages. In the southern coastal plain and Ramla zones there were at least nineteen villages which had families of Egyptian origin, and in the northern part of Samaria, including the ’Ara Valley, there are a number of villages with substantial population of Egyptian stock.
Grossman, D. (1984-12-01). ”Spatial analysis of historical migrations in Samaria”. GeoJournal. 9 (4): 400, 403–404. Bibcode:1984GeoJo…9..393G. doi:10.1007/BF00171604. ISSN 1572-9893.
James, Boris (2019-07-03), ”Constructing the Realm of the Kurds (al-Mamlaka al-Akradiyya): Kurdish In-betweenness and Mamluk Ethnic Engineering (1130-1340 CE)”, Grounded Identities, Brill, pp. 17–45, doi:10.1163/9789004385337_003, ISBN 978-90-04-38533-7, S2CID 199158319, retrieved 2024-02-05
Taxel, I. (2018). Migration to and within Palestine in the early Islamic period: Two archaeological paradigms. In Migration and Migrant Identities in the Near East from Antiquity to the Middle Ages (pp. 222-243). Routledge.
Doumani, B. (1995). Rediscovering Palestine, Merchants and Peasants in Jabal Nablus, 1700–1900. University of California Press. Chapter: ”The 1657 Campaign.”
Swedenburg, Ted (2003). Memories of Revolt: The 1936–1939 Rebellion and the Palestinian National Past. University of Arkansas Press. p. 81. ISBN 978-1-55728-763-2. These primordialist claims regarding the Palestinians’ primeval and prior roots in the land operated at the level of the collective. When it came to an individual’s own family, however, Arab-Islamic discourse took precedence over archaeological justifications. I ran across no Palestinian villager (or urbanite) who claimed personal descent from the Canaanites. Villagers typically traced their family or their hamila’s origins back to a more recent past in the Arabian peninsula. Many avowed descent from some nomadic tribe that had migrated from Arabia to Palestine either during or shortly after the Arab-Islamic conquests. By such a claim they inserted their family’s history into the narrative of Arab and Islamic civilization and connected themselves to a genealogy that possessed greater local and contemporary prestige than did ancient or pre-Islamic descent. Several men specifically connected their forefathers’ date of entry into Palestine to their participation in the army of Salih al-Din al-Ayyubi (Saladin), a historical figure whose significance has been retrospectively enlarged by nationalist discourse such that he is now regarded not merely as a hero of ”Islamic” civilization but as a ”national” luminary as well.+ (Modern nationalist discourse tends to downplay Salah al-Din’s Kurdish origins.) Palestinians of all political stripes viewed Salah al-Din’s wars against the Crusaders as a forerunner of the current combats against foreign intruders. Many considered Salah al-Din’s victory over the Crusaders at Hittin (A.D. 1187) as a historical precedent that offered hope for their own eventual triumph even if, like the Crusader wars, the current struggle with Israel was destined to last more than two centuries. Family histories affiliated to earlier ”patriotic” struggles against European aggression tied interviewees to a continuous narrative of national resistance. Villagers claiming descent from Arabs who entered Palestine during the Arab-Islamic conquest equally viewed these origins as establishing their historical precedence over the Jews
Lowin, Shari (2010-10-01), ”Khaybar”, Encyclopedia of Jews in the Islamic World, Brill, pp. 148–150, doi:10.1163/1878-9781_ejiw_com_0012910, retrieved 2023-06-22, Khaybar’s Jews appear in Arab folklore as well. […] The Muḥamara family of the Arab village of Yutta, near Hebron, trace their descent to the Jews of Khaybar. Families in other nearby villages tell of similar lineages.
Erlich (Zhabo), Ze’ev H.; Rotter, Meir (2021). ”ארבע מנורות שומרוניות בכפר חג’ה שבשומרון” [Four Samaritan Menorahs from the village of Hajjeh, Samaria]. במעבה ההר. 11 (2). Ariel University Publishing: 188–204. doi:10.26351/IHD/11-2/3. S2CID 245363335.
Ben Zvi 1985, p. 8.
Haber, Marc; Gauguier, Dominique; Youhanna, Sonia; Patterson, Nick; Moorjani, Priya; Botigué, Laura R.; Platt, Daniel E.; Matisoo-Smith, Elizabeth; Soria-Hernanz, David F.; Wells, R.
Vanhanaikaiset painetut WSOY:n tai Otavan tietosanakirjat olivat sisällöltään huomattavasti luotettavampia kuin Wikipedia, koska niihin oli tiedot otettu oikeilta asiantuntijoilta varmoista lähteistä ja ne olivat moneen kertaan tarkistettuja ennen painattamista. Ongelmana oli kuitenkin niiden tietojen päivityksen puute ja lisäykset, joita ajan mukaan tarvitaan.
Wikipedian etuna on ajantasaisuus ja laajempi hakusanasto, mutta lähdekritiikkiä joutuu harrastamaan enemmän.
Ilmoita asiaton viesti